{"id":501,"date":"2012-03-02T00:24:10","date_gmt":"2012-03-01T16:24:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/?p=501"},"modified":"2012-03-07T00:42:48","modified_gmt":"2012-03-06T16:42:48","slug":"thoughts-on-the-lytro-camera","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/2012\/03\/thoughts-on-the-lytro-camera","title":{"rendered":"Thoughts on the Lytro Camera"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_502\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-502\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/lytro.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-502\" title=\"Lytro cameras\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/lytro.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/lytro.jpg 640w, http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/lytro-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-502\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Lytro Cameras. (Picture courtesy of Lytro Inc.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Launched last year and recently shipped, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lytro.com\/camera\" target=\"_blank\">Lytro camera<\/a> is a revolutionary camera from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lytro.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Lytro Inc.<\/a> which uses light field technology. The main selling point is that it allows you to readjust the focus of an image after it&#8217;s been taken, thereby eliminating the blurry shots that supposedly plague consumers.<\/p>\n<p>Following its announcement, there were a lot of interest surrounding it, and many people, including my non-photographer friends were raving about how impressive the technology was. My photographer friends and I were however, unexcited. Some pundits are even decrying the death of photography as an art form as this encourages the &#8220;spray and pray&#8221; attitude when taking photos.<\/p>\n<p>Conceptually, this sounds like a great idea. You can now shoot without a thought of where the focus point is, and then adjust later. How much nicer can that be?<\/p>\n<p>Well, consumer digital cameras and camera phones like the iPhone 4S now takes very high quality pictures. I&#8217;ve noticed that most of the blurred shots I&#8217;ve seen are actually blurred due to camera shake and not the camera mis-focussing. They also tend to be taken in less-than-ideal situations (e.g. in a bar) which gives rise to slow shutter speeds, causing the camera shake.<\/p>\n<p>Such cameras have small sensors and a very deep depth of field, which makes pretty much everything sharp. In fact, it has so much depth of field that trying to create a portrait  with a blurred background (i.e. <em>bokeh<\/em>) is quite an impossible task under most situations. Image stabilisation technology is also helping to eliminate camera shakes (to a certain extent) and reduce the chances of blurred pictures due to camera shake.<\/p>\n<p>This reduces the practical use of the Lytro&#8217;s &#8220;focus after you shoot&#8221;. And unlike a conventional camera, whereby you can actually get a picture of everything being sharp by using a smaller aperture, photos taken by the Lytro always have a sharp and a blurred portion, similar to pictures taken with a wide-open aperture. Do you really want every picture to look like that?<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, there&#8217;s the post-processing (aka selecting the focus point) after you shoot. It&#8217;s already quite hard to convince the average consumer to shoot in the superior RAW format (if their camera supports it) as it&#8217;s just too much work for them. The last thing they want to do after a trip is to edit 1,000 pictures. So most pictures are uploaded straight to FaceBook, etc, including the unrotated ones. One might argue that you don&#8217;t have to edit, but doesn&#8217;t this make the &#8220;focus after the fact&#8221; feature useless then?<\/p>\n<p>Thirdly, the Lytro takes photos at a resolution of only 1080&#215;1080, slightly less than 1.2 megapixels, good enough only for the web. Though megapixels alone does not make a great feature, this is a very low resolution by today&#8217;s standards. Any modern smartphone and compact camera can take very high quality, sharp photos compared to the Lytro. In fact, Nokia has just announced the 41 megapixel 808 PureView phone.<\/p>\n<p>Lastly, there&#8217;s the ergonomics of the camera itself. Unconventionally shaped, it makes holding it difficult. The small low-res touchscreen LCD (26mm x 26mm with only 49,000 dots) makes image reviewing difficult. It&#8217;s possibly also difficult to select the focus point from the such a small screen when shooting.<\/p>\n<p>In conclusion, I think this is a great idea on paper, but it needs a lot more refinement to be really successful. Right now, I think it&#8217;s only a novelty\/gimmicky product.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Launched last year and recently shipped, the Lytro camera is a revolutionary camera from Lytro Inc. which uses light field technology. The main selling point is that it allows you to readjust the focus of an image after it&#8217;s been taken, thereby eliminating the blurry shots that supposedly plague consumers. Following its announcement, there were&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/2012\/03\/thoughts-on-the-lytro-camera\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Thoughts on the Lytro Camera<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[213,38,211,210,212],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=501"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":512,"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions\/512"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ckphoto.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}